The ACE2 Triple Decoy that neutralizes SARSCoV2 displays increased interest in trojan alternatives

From Selfless
Jump to navigation Jump to search

5 ± 3.9 vs. 100.9 ± 4.2 μm, P = 0.013) and smaller ACD (325.7 ± 5.7 vs. 405.6 ± 6.3 μm, P less then 0.001) than WT mice, which is the converse of what occurs in patients who lack CHRDL1. Retinal-thalamic projections and other ocular measurements did not significantly differ between KO and WT mice. Conclusions Male Chrdl1 KO mice do not have the same anterior chamber abnormalities seen in humans with CHRDL1 mutations. Therefore, Chrdl1 KO mice do not recapitulate the human MGC1 phenotype. Nevertheless, Chrdl1 plays a role during mouse ocular development because corneas in KO mice differ from those in WT mice.Purpose To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Danish Keratoconus Outcome Research Questionnaire (KORQ). Methods Phase 1 Rasch analysis assessed the original Danish KORQ. Phase 2 Reengineering of the Danish KORQ to optimize the psychometric properties and functioning of the KORQ. Results The KORQ was self-administered by 195 patients. Phase 1 displayed trouble with local dependency and poor item fit. In phase 2, local dependency was addressed, and acceptable item fit was obtained for both subscales by collapsing item pairs into superitems (A6+A7, A9+A17, and S6+S9) and deleting 2 items (S4 and S2). After these corrections, the inter-item range was 0.28 to 0.72 for activity limitation scale (AL-S) and 0.14 to 0.54 for symptoms scale (S-S). Ordered thresholds were present, except in items A11, S5, and S10. No differential item functioning was present. Person separation reliability was 0.93 for AL-S and 0.81 for S-S. The person-item maps showed that the target was slightly above the study population. The maximal corneal curvature was the clinical measure of keratoconus with the highest correlation of 0.33 for AL-S and 0.24 for S-S. Evaluating individual questions showed that patients had the most trouble seeing at distance, driving at night, and wearing rigid gas-permeable lenses, whereas the least troublesome areas were walking up/downstairs, doing household tasks, avoiding objects on their path, and doing their job. Conclusions The revised Danish KORQ largely fulfilled the assumptions of the Rasch model and displayed satisfactory psychometric properties. The need to revise the Danish KORQ highlights that cross-cultural validation is of key importance when working with patient-reported outcomes.Purpose To isolate and characterize an epithelial cell (EC) line from a human donor cornea, which may serve as a reliable test cell line to address biomolecular issues and study the response of corneal epithelium to stressing events and therapeutic treatments. Methods A corneal button from a donor patient was treated with enzymes to separate the epithelial sheet and to free EC, which were put in tissue culture. selleck compound ECs were characterized by optic and electronic microscopies, cytokeratins and PAX6 were detected by SDS-PAGE and western immunoblotting, the barrier function was evaluated by transepithelial electric resistance and by the immune detection of membrane junction proteins, and the karyotype was characterized according to the classical methods. Results Morphological analyses returned the picture of classical homogeneous polygonal morphology as expecetd by EC that was maintained over time and several in vitro passages. Transepithelial electric resistance values were characteristic of a typical barrier-forming cell line. The cytokeratin expression pattern was the one expected for corneal EC with a predominance of CK3 and CK5 and different from a human keratocyte cell line. The male karyotype showed 2 trisomies, of chromosomes 8 and 11. Conclusions All the data so far obtained with the HCE-F cells concur to certify this cell line as a stable, true primary human corneal EC line, which could then be used as a test cell line to study and address the questions concerning the biological response of human corneal epithelium to stressing and/or therapeutic treatments and as a term of comparison for EC derived from pathological corneas.Purpose To report an unusual case of a patient with keratoconus and acute hydrops complicated with corneal perforation and describe its management using a new surgical approach. Methods A case report and new surgical approach description. Results A 47-year-old female patient with a history of keratoconus and implantable contact lens surgery presented at our institute with symptoms of acute corneal hydrops in her right eye. On examination, best corrected visual acuity was of counting fingers in the involved eye. Slit-lamp examination revealed a small inferotemporal corneal perforation, surrounded by marked corneal edema and a positive Seidel test. Initial attempts of conservative treatment with cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive application and bandage soft contact lens placement were ineffective. We decided to proceed with an inferior, lamellar wedge resection of the diseased corneal tissue. One month postoperatively, the cornea remained clear, whereas best corrected visual acuity was 0.1. Conclusions Lamellar wedge resection could represent an alternative surgical approach for keratoconic patients, with eccentric acute hydrops and subsequent corneal perforation that provides rapid visual rehabilitation.Purpose To report the first case of corneal graft rejection presumably associated with pembrolizumab immunotherapy. Methods Case report and literature review. Results An asymptomatic 85-year-old woman with a history of bilateral penetrating keratoplasty presented for a follow-up visit with bilateral diffuse keratic precipitates and subepithelial infiltrates. There were no anterior chamber cells. Bilateral subclinical corneal graft rejection was suspected. Three months previously, pembrolizumab immunotherapy was started for a metastatic urothelial cell tumor. Corneal graft rejection was managed with topical dexamethasone drops, which were tapered slowly. Pembrolizumab treatment was continued with careful ophthalmological follow-up. Unfortunately, recurrence of corneal graft rejection was observed 8 weeks after cessation of topical dexamethasone drops. After consulting the treating oncologist, pembrolizumab treatment was stopped to prevent recurrent corneal graft rejection. Conclusions We report the first case of corneal graft rejection presumably associated with pembrolizumab immunotherapy.